The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was designed to ensure that Americans can afford health insurance coverage and are financially protected against potentially high health care costs. This required addressing two connected problems: the cost barriers to accessing coverage and care and the comprehensive risk protection provided by insurance, particularly for people in danger of high spending. To do this, the ACA expanded insurance coverage in several ways and developed new federal rules for both the individual and group insurance markets. In a recent article in Health Affairs commemorating the 10th anniversary of the passage of the law, Sherry Glied of New York University, the Commonwealth Fund’s Sara Collins, and Saunders Lin of Oregon Health and Science University reviewed evidence on whether it has been effective in achieving its goals.
The ACA made significant gains in improving coverage and access and protecting Americans against the financial risks of illness.
A review of the research literature on the effects of the ACA indicates that the law helped protect Americans against the financial risks of illness, reduced the uninsured rate, improved access to care, and lowered out-of-pocket spending. But subsequent court decisions, along with congressional and executive branch actions, have limited the ACA’s reach. Congress and the Trump administration also have chipped away at the law’s market reforms. Texas v. United States, which is headed to the Supreme Court, contests the constitutionality of the law.
The ACA made significant gains in improving coverage and access and protecting Americans against the financial risks of illness, but court decisions and congressional and executive branch actions threaten to erode that progress.